ネットでググると大抵以下が出てきますが、自分の環境では違っていて、無駄に詰まったのでメモします。
・ネット情報：Windows(C:)＞ユーザー＞（ユーザー名）＞
AppDate＞Roaming＞Apple Computer＞
MobileSync＞Backup
・自分の環境：Windows(C:)＞ユーザー＞（ユーザー名）＞
Apple＞MobileSync＞Backup※Windows10の場合です。たぶんWindows11も同じだとは思いますが、確認していませんのであしからず。
自分はCドライブの容量が1TBあるんですが、空き容量を食いつぶすとPCが恐ろしく重くなるので、別の記憶媒体に退避するべくひと工夫しています。
ひと工夫とはシンボリックリンクで外付けSSDに保存するものです。（そんなのもう知ってるって思われるかもですが・・・）
これも備忘録を兼ねて、手順をメモします。cmdと仲良くなりましょう。
- 外付けSSDなどをPCに接続する
いっぱいつなぐとドライブ名がどんどんアルファベット進んでいきますが、たまに名称がおかしくなってバグります。抜き差しとかフォーマットとかすると順番おかしくなることがあります。気を付けましょう。自分はいくつかつないでいるので”J”ドライブでした。 - ターゲットにしたいフォルダを決める
空のフォルダを作成します。フォルダ名は任意ですが、後でわからなくなるので同じにします。
（例）J:＞iTunes_Backup＞MobileSync_Backup＞Backup＞00008030-00xxxxxxxxxxxxxE
- 「Backup」フォルダを開く
（例）C:＞ユーザー＞（ユーザー名）＞Apple＞MobileSync＞Backupをエクスプローラで開きます。
対象フォルダの名前を変更します。
※既に存在するとコマンドエラーになるためです。「_old」などにしておきましょう。
- cmd（コマンドプロンプト）を開く
エクスプローラでcmdと直打ちしてEnterしたらそのフォルダパスで一発で開けますが、、、
シンボリックリンクを作るには管理者権限が必要なので、パスをメモするか工夫して同じパスを開きましょう。
普通にやるならcmdを右クリックして「管理者として実行」から開きます。
「system32」と表示されている（管理者権限である）ことを確認して、
メモしたフォルダパスにcdコマンドで移動します。
（例）cd C:\Users\（ユーザ名）\Apple\MobileSync\Backup
- シンボリックリンクを作成する
MKLINK /D "リンク" "ターゲット"
で作成できます。
（注意点）
“リンク”：同じ名前のフォルダが既にあるとコマンドエラーになります
“ターゲット”：コマンドには影響ありませんが、同じ名前のフォルダがないとシンボリックリンクが動作しません
コマンドを打って完了です。
（例）mklink /d C:\Users\（ユーザ名）\Apple\MobileSync\Backup\00008030-00xxxxxxxxxxxxxE J:\iTunes_Backup\MobileSync_Backup\Backup\00008030-00xxxxxxxxxxxxxE
- 新しく空っぽの”リンク”（シンボリックリンク）ができました。
この中に「_old」に変えておいた中身を切り取ってペーストしてあげればCドライブの容量が削減されます。
余計なファイルを混ぜたり、まるごと移さないとバックアップが壊れる可能性があるので注意しましょう。
これで少しハッピーになれます。めでたしめでたし。
コメント
最高！ 旅行サイト、自分らしくくださいね。感謝いっぱい！ [url=https://iqvel.com/ja/country/%E3%83%A2%E3%83%AB%E3%83%89%E3%83%90]静かな旅[/url] DM待ってます — トラブルも回避できる。
Yo players, I just figured to post one thing I accidentally came across as browsing online gaming posts. After a long PC gaming grind, I checked a pretty interesting post about some new online gaming-casino brand that from what I understood has a mentioned worldwide license.
I am obviously not trying to advertise some random site, but being a regular player, I found the idea curious. The biggest thing that got my eye was that the review described the casino as built for players from different countries. Of course, that does never mean that every single person can play in literally every country. Regional rules still count, and every player should verify the country-specific terms before registering.
Still, the idea sounded quite different. The article said that the site was made for users from different markets, with support that feel more global than outdated casino sites. It wrote about quick registration, clean UX, smartphone support, and several payment tools.
As a player, I always look at the interface first. When a site is clunky, I usually leave right instantly. The article made the platform sound responsive, which is not a small thing because today users are used to high-quality platforms. A messy interface can kill even a decent site.
The licensing part was also the main reason I kept reading. There are countless questionable casino sites around the web, and plenty of of them push huge claims without clarifying much. So when an article focuses on official licensing, that usually makes me look closer. But again, personally I would still look up the regulator myself before recommending anything.
The article also mentioned casino game variety. It sounded like the site has slot games, roulette and blackjack, and streamed table games. I know casino games are obviously separate from video games, but there is still some shared design language in how platforms try to keep people engaged. Things like progress systems, daily offers, and quick feedback loops are present in both digital platforms.
One thing I noticed in the article was that it seemed to bring up careful gambling. Responsible play is serious, because cash are involved. Playing should stay controlled, not become something unhealthy. The article listed things like spending limits, cool-off options, and responsible gaming tools. In my opinion, any serious casino platform should provide those controls by default.
Another interesting part was the global audience. The article made it sound like the platform is not just focused on one local market, but on many markets. That sounds useful, especially for people who play from different places, but it also means users need to be careful. Worldwide does absolutely not automatically mean allowed everywhere. There are usually limited regions, and those lists should be confirmed before playing.
I also thought about how [url=https://whdc.ac/index.php/User:ClayBoswell5858]casino platforms[/url] are becoming more like entertainment hubs. They focus on speed, personalization, and simple use. For older casino websites, the experience sometimes felt slow. But newer ones seem to understand that gamers expect modern design. That does not make a casino automatically better, but it does show that the team is at least thinking about accessibility.
The transaction side also sounded somewhat important. The article explained that the platform supports different deposit options, which helps for global users. But that is another area where people should read the fees. Cashout rules are really important, because a site can look nice, but if withdrawals are problematic, then the experience becomes frustrating.
To be clear, I am not to say this platform is perfect. I just found the post different because it shows how the regulated entertainment industry is evolving. More platforms are trying to look global, and more of them are using entertainment-focused design. For people who follow gaming, that is pretty interesting to watch.
Have anyone else here noticed similar articles about modern online casinos? Do you think global regulation actually makes a meaningful difference, or do you mostly care about security? I am personally curious from the technology perspective, not trying to sell anyone. And, of course, whenever someone decides to try any casino site, they should verify local laws, read the terms, protect their budget, and play responsibly.
I’m from Australia and recently I decided to try [url=https://payinnv.tech]https://payinnv.tech[/url] just out of curiosity. To begin with, I paid attention to the site as a whole: it all feels fairly well-put-together, it is easy to navigate, and the games is quick to come across. From my perspective, that’s a crucial factor, because if the layout feels overwhelming or hard to use, the urge to play usually disappear almost immediately.
I first came across VegaZone when hunting for casinos with more convenient layouts and crash-style content. Ultimately, I chose to give it a proper look and check how enjoyable normal sessions felt like on the platform. On that front, my experience has been quite good: everything is easy to follow, with no unnecessary complexity, and the site comes across as easy-going as a whole.
I also liked the fact that the platform has a decent variety of titles, and there’s no a sense that you’re limited to a single category. You can jump in for a short visit, or spend more time if you’re in the mood. I’ve always preferred sites where there’s no need to take a long time learning the interface and you can easily move on to exactly what you want to play.
What caught my attention most here was definitely the crash-style games. Personally, I enjoy them a lot better than classic slots, because they have another kind of pace and the sessions feel more dynamic. There’s a greater level of engagement in the gameplay, there are decision points, and for that reason the game feels more enjoyable to me than going through the motions with slots over and over.
I personally usually approach things more calmly and more often than not stick to smaller multipliers, instead of always hunting for some huge x’s. That approach just sits more natural to me personally: gameplay flow more evenly, it’s easier to stay in the game longer and enjoy the gameplay itself. When you’re not trying to turn each stake into an “”all or nothing””, the experience becomes far more relaxed.
Over the long run, that kind of approach suits me enjoy the most. With smaller multipliers, it’s possible to play at your own pace, not burning through your budget and without turning every session into a constant race for a big win. To me, that makes the whole process more enjoyable.
In general, VegaZone left me with quite a pleasant impression specifically as a comfortable platform for easy-going play and normal gameplay free from unnecessary stress. If crash games, a simple layout and a more paced approach sounds like your thing, this platform might work well perfectly.